Reviewer Inger L Genest
El zapato es muy resistente, se ajusta como un guante y no ocasiona molestias
Reviewer Y S Park
They are exactly what I expected. Nice comfortable loaf around shoes not meant to be used as athletic shoes.
Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer Victoria De Alba
These are great for narrow feet. My husband has trouble getting shoes that aren’t too wide and puma and adidas fit him well.
Reviewer T Otis
ok shoe, very drafty. runs about a half size larger than asics
Reviewer Abby Storm
Most comfortable shoe i have ever worn. Awesome!!!!
Reviewer Awesome Ninja
This shoe fits great, right out of the box. I normally wear a 3E but have had foot problems with neuropathy and hard to heal blisters on my little toe. This gives me the extra room, looks like a regular walking shoe and is comfortable at half the price of an orthopedic shoe. In fact it fits better than an orthopedic shoe because the sole isn't overly thick or heavy. It is definitely a true 6E width shoe (unlike some other companies who advertise 6E and when you order the shoe it is actually more like 3E) I would recomend this to others with similar foot problems.
Reviewer doe barnett
My husband wore these so much till they were falling apart but that been like 3 years now. I wish I could find a woman's pair with the pocket on the side like this that I like. I would love to have a pair for myself.
Reviewer b9ll
Great comfortable shoe for working in a concrete floor building!!
Reviewer Robert Strauss
Very comfortable fits great and so soft love them
English
